Archive for the ‘History’ Category

Modern-day B. Virdots to help Stark folks in need

Thursday, November 25th, 2010

By Gary Brown  | Canton Repository |  November 25, 2010

The giving spirit of B. Virdot lives again.

Three Stark County men have pledged to give $100 gifts — a total of $15,000 — to 150 families and individuals who have been hit especially hard by the economic times. They are patterning their generosity after a Canton businessman — known for decades only as B. Virdot — who in 1933 made gifts of $5 to 150 area families whose finances were strapped by the Great Depression.

And, as was the case with the man who inspired them, the trio of benefactors wishes to remain anonymous. The givers will be known to the recipients of their gifts by the revived name of B. Virdot.

“The Stone family is delighted that in another time of need there is another B. Virdot to reach out and help,” said Ted Gup, the former Canton resident who, in the recently published book “A Secret Gift,” revealed how he discovered about two years ago that B. Virdot was his grandfather, Sam Stone.

SERVED AS INSPIRATION

Articles in The Repository about that book, and about Gup’s Palace Theatre event focusing on the families Stone helped with his gifts, served as inspiration to the three men, one wrote in an e-mail to the newspaper.

The articles told how a man calling himself B. Virdot placed an ad in The Canton Repository on Dec. 18, 1933, offering to give “modest” gifts of money to men or families in need of it, “so they will be able to spend a merry and joyful Christmas.”

A front-page story about the gifts was published in the newspaper on the same 1933 date as the advertisement.

The three men were sitting at a restaurant discussing the gifts and relating the story to today’s recession. They “thought it would be a good idea if B. Virdot might live again,” according to the e-mail sent to The Repository.

“What we propose is a joint effort … to repeat the offer for cash gifts to those most in need.”

The plan is as simple as Stone’s. The men will provide the money. The Repository will solicit letters from individuals and families explaining a need. Requests for help will be screened by a rabbi, a priest and a minister, who also will remain anonymous. They will choose the 150 recipients of the $100 gifts.

The donors believe members of the clergy would be better equipped to choose deserving recipients because of their experience in helping others.

The gifts will be distributed by United Way of Greater Stark County.

“We feel that all this should be done,” the representative of the donors said, “in the name of B. Virdot.”

The Repository agreed to respect the donors’ wish to remain anonymous.

GIVING CONTINUES

Gup said he was notified by the United Way that after articles about his Palace Theatre program appeared in The New York Times and The Repository, the United Way of Greater Stark County was contacted by potential donors from as far away as New York and Seattle.

“We have not seen the end of this,” Gup said.

The modern-day B. Virdot trio who are prepared to help the community through tough times hopes the giving continues. One of the men said he believes their gifts will inspire others to find their own ways of becoming B. Virdot in their hearts.

Gup feels his grandfather is “looking on, smiling” at the gesture made by the men.

“I’m sure he would applaud this gift,” Gup said of his grandfather. “It’s totally in keeping with the spirit of B. Virdot.”

Stark County Residents in need of money:

Write a letter explaining why you need the money and mail it to:

B. Virdot
C/O The Repository
500 Market Ave. S
Canton, OH  44702
No phone calls or e-mails, please

The Lessons Learned in Hardship

Monday, September 20th, 2010

You don’t need me to tell you that these are difficult times for many Americans. One in ten workers is jobless. One in five children lives below the poverty line. And yet, for most of us, these times are not to be confused with The Hard Times, the decade of The Depression. As I worked on my book, A Secret Gift, I interviewed at least five hundred people about their memories of those years, what they learned from such hardships, and how they were changed by them.

America was different then. Americans were different. Almost no one looked to government for help. Instead, they looked to family, to neighbors, to the church or synagogue. But mostly, they looked inward. They were proud, often too proud to admit the depths of their needs. They often hid those needs and their despair from those closest to them, not wanting to add to the burdens of loved ones. Early on I asked those who had been children in the Depression if they ever went to bed hungry. Now in their eighties and nineties, they often laughed at the question. Hunger for many was a constant. They often filled their bellies with dandelion salads or beans. Mothers were credited with miracles, conjuring up suppers from nothing. Many children did not know the word “breakfast” until years later when there was food enough for a morning meal. And even my presumption that they slept in a “bed” triggered amusement. Many grew accustomed to sleeping on hard floors, warmed only by the proximity of their parents and siblings. Evictions and repossessions had left them with nothing. Many lived as nomads.

Laying their hands on a pair of shoes decent enough to keep the snow out, was a relentless concern. Without shoes, children could not go to school, mothers and fathers could not walk the streets in search of day labor, and those who hunted for their next meal were limited by how long they could expose their feet to the cold. Adults could wear a single pair of shoes year after year, but children’s growing feet could not. Shoes were among the most coveted items in the Great Depression, just behind bread and coal.

The safety nets we have today – Social Security, Medicaid, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Unemployment – all these were unknown to Americans in the early years of the Great Depression. They come to us as a legacy of those Hard Times. From those times we learned that even the most earnest and resourceful of Americans sometimes could not make it without outside help, that being unable to find work was not evidence of personal failure or lack of character. In that period the stigma attached to accepting a hand up, if not a hand out, began to dissolve. From those times we learned that Individuals had limits and unless we acted collectively and collaboratively the entire country was at risk. Today we speak of “Entitlements.” In 1933 the word had little place in the national vocabulary and even less in the national budget. Today, the debate continues over how much or how little government should intervene in times of crisis. But only the most diehard of revanchists would dismantle the basic apparatus that was created to alleviate massive public suffering and avert another financial calamity.

There is much we who grew up in more prosperous times inherited from those who endured so much. There are the bits and pieces of folk wisdom – the “waste not, want not” mindset, the saving of string and rubber bands, the notion that exiting a room meant turning off the light. It was 1933 that Scotch Tape came to market. Anything that could be repaired was. It was 1933 that the Lone Ranger came to the airwaves, rescuing communities that could not rescue themselves. And it was 1933 that an out-of-work heating engineer began to market a new game to be called Monopoly. Its Darwinian vision of capitalism mirrored the experience of many. The word “enough” took on special meaning in those years. It was uttered with a certain defiance. It was less a measure of what one had than who one was. It spoke to the sufficiency of will. Those who could say they had enough were still to be counted among the undefeated.

These are trying times for many. For some, particularly those long out of work, they are barely distinguishable from The Hard Times. In the depths of this Great Recession, some sixteen million Americans were out of work. That’s one million more than in the Great Depression. Granted, the population was smaller then and the percent of jobless was higher – 25% vs. 10 % — but to those unable to find work and to provide for loved ones, such numbers bring little comfort.